Friday 15 May 2015

Semester 2 Evaluation

Documentary
In the second semester, I was given a brief to create a five minute documentary on a subject that related to Liverpool, England.  Myself and three fellow peers joined forces to come up with a few ideas of what to do. The group members were Connor Fieldsend, Oliver MacLellan, Nick Gosling & Tom Woods.

Concept one was interviewing hotels/hostels receptionist to see if we can get any unusual but stories about previous guests. This concept was built on purely the humour factor as our target audience was aimed at 16-24 year olds as this is the age group to book out hotels, but mostly hostels which brings the theme of the documentary in place. We thought that as Liverpool is known for its ever increasing nightlife, it would be a great place to base our documentary on. The idea was going to be based around the guests also, mostly the younger ones who has booked out a room for exploring the nightlife. As a group we thought that there will be a contrast between the day guests to the night but we ruled it out as the age group for the documentary will probably not be around in the daytime to talk to us.
Group member Connor Fieldsend was going to direct this short documentary as it was his idea. I was going to produce as I have substantial amount of experience in contacting the responsible individuals regarding shooting permission etc.

Concept two was based around the history of the Eric’s Club which was an infamous live music venue back in the 60/70s. The idea was to interview individuals that used to attend or work at the club to get an insight of what the scene was like around that era. Liverpool is known for its music scene and we wanted to show how the club helped many artists and bands to get their heard locally and nationally. In Liverpool, you can see that The Beatles has left a mark on the city but our idea was trying to move away from that as you can see by looking at Liverpool the story is being retold with the amount of shops, stalls, and museums. We saw that Eric’s was sort of an underdog so we tried to tell the story of the place.
Surprisingly, I was billed to be the producer of this project but as Tom already gained the relevant contacts, we became the producer which left me as the director of the project; even though it was initially Tom’s idea for the film. At first I found carrying this project difficult because I felt that I was out of my comfort zone as I was not into the genre of music that the documentary was based on.

At first, my vision for this project was lost but I did watch a few documentaries to see how I can angle the project. The only downfall I had in the project was not watching many music documentaries; I made myself watching other documentaries including The Imposter (2012) and Bowling for Columbine (2002) as the subject matter interested me. I only got the idea of watching similar films to the film concept because my lecturer Debbie told me I should’ve. In my recent visits to the cinema, I came across Cobain: Montage of Heck directed by Brett Morgen. The film focused on Nirvana’s lead Kurt Cobain life and his music until up to his death. The film was amazing and I wish it was released sooner for inspiration.

Tom got some excellent contributors for the film but some dropped out days before filming. There was going to be an audio interview but unfortunately did not happen. In the end we got two solid contributors, one that worked at Eric’s and one who was a former band member who plays regularly at Eric’s.
The shooting of the project ran like clockwork. We had suitable locations for the subject matter and everything seem to fit. Our first Contributor Doren was interviewed in a bar that had low lighting, we as a group felt that this was a location we could work in our favour. Our idea was to show that Doren is being shown in low lighting to show the audience that she is in a nightclub environment, something similar to what she used to work in.

With former band member Keith, he was interviewed in a space where it had many images of artists including John Lennon, Jimi Hendrix and Blondie located in the Liverpool Institute for Performing Arts. As Keith is no longer in a band, we wanted to do it somewhere appropriate to the documentary. As the filming process went on, the structure of the film built and I finally got the hang in my role. I worked closely with Oliver, who was the cameraman to capture the correct shots and the B-roll for the project. I and Oliver created a shot list loosely because we did not reece Liverpool prior to the shoot. I believe that this was our downfall as I feel that if we did, we could’ve got some better footage.

Overall the production went smoothly even though there were problems with contributors last minute. Everyone did a marvellous job of maintain their role and acting professionally in front of contributors. There is nothing that I would do differently in this project but I would’ve added shots of night clubbers around Liverpool. Unfortunately as production was in the weekdays, there was not many people around the pubs and clubs to film.

Tom was the editor of the project and I did sit in many editing sessions with him to make sure if he needed my assistance for any of the edit. As the director, it was my duty to overlook the edit to see where there were faults or something that did not work. The edit ran smoothly with minor setbacks but all and all we submitted the film in time for the presentation. Nick was absent for the entire production but worked on the sound design for the film. In the post-production stage, we finally came down in a name for the production The Other Side of Mathew Street – the reason for this title was because of the famous Carven Club which was on the same street as Eric’s Club.

Overall I have learnt some interesting aspect of documentary filmmaking and I will apply them to my future work.


Drama
In the drama brief, we were given the task to create a five minute film which had the theme of ‘journey’. For preparation for the project, the seminar watched many short films that dealt with the theme and how each differs when it came down to narrative and structure. Again the group members for the project were same except Nick Gosling who had to join another group.

After working a few short films, in the seminars and our independent time, he came up with a concept what we felt was very strong. The concept was Connor Fieldsend idea and I’m sure that everyone in the group thought he had a strong idea and it could be well executed. I was slightly worried that some viewers would dislike the film has it is dialogue driven and one and less in one location but Connor script was so strong that people should be hooked and wanting to know the conclusion. The script got praised by many including our module lecturer.

For the project, I took the role of the sound recorder, Oliver was again on camera, Connor was the director and Tom was the editor and sound designer. The reason why I took on the role was because we got criticized for the sound volumes in our last project and as I have had experience in recording sound in the past, I took on the role with confident.
Connor produced the project as he had the actors he wanted to use in mind when the project got green-lighted. Tom and Connor scouted the location of the shoot, somewhere far from Sheffield centre which overlooked the city. I must say the location was beautiful but thoughts came into my head as why they chosen that location; it could’ve been that there would not be any disturbances of the shoot from the public. There were many problems that occurred with the possibly actors days before the production but Connor managed to cast the two lead actors at the last minute.
We began production for the project starting with the carpark flashback scene. The shoot was easy and straight forward for me as there was not any dialogue that needed recording but I did get some ambient sound of the location and Foley recordings. A week later we filmed on the hill which I can say that we ran into some problems with crew members not knowing some set rules. As we had actors in place, Oliver began recording, I was on the sound and Connor was directing. Unfortunately Tom could not make it to the shoot so we were only a person down. Connor did the clapperboard but he did not do it in front of the camera but behind the camera and said “action”. I immediately said cut and said to Connor and Oliver that it is not how you use the clapperboard as the editor and logger of the footage needs to see the scene no, the shot no and the take no. I understand that Connor has a disadvantage with his disability but I knew that Tom will have a difficult time editing the film. As we only had the actors for a limited time, Connor said that he would sit with the Tom with the edit to help him sync up the audio and video together.

This is my only criticism about the shoot that the clapperboard was used incorrectly. I believe that I recorded sound professionally and the sound volumes were perfect. I revised the script before the shoot so I knew where to put the microphone at what time. Sound is very important, and without it could ruin the chances of the video to be at a high quality. Each of the actors did a brilliant job of portraying two brothers, I could feel the connection with them when they were acting and it made the script very believable. We had minor disturbances in the shoot but nothing major.

A few days later, the post-production began and what I was afraid about with the audio I recorded came true. Tom had a difficult time matching the audio with the image as he had troubling hearing Connor say what scene, what shot and what take it was for. I am unsure that anyone did a logging sheet for the footage, again difficult time edit without this. I decided to record ADR (automated dialogue replacement) to help Tom with the edit but I don’t think this was used. Connor and Tom decided to use the sound from the camera as it was easier. Other than that I believe the edit went smoothly and we got to present on time.

This shoot has been an experience for me as I know what it’s important to know before you go on set. I have gained experience of filmmaking over the years but I do understand that some people may need some extra help when it comes down to filming. Everyone was professionally on set of this drama short film and I feel that Connor’s script and direction of the piece was brilliant despite the audio problems. I will be honest it did dishearten me that little to none of the audio got used as I felt I recorded some clear audio but it’s a learning curve for people to take the right actions in production.

Wednesday 6 May 2015

Stubborn Sound Log

Stubborn - Sound log 

Date: 28/04/15

Name: Tony Ansell

Roles: Sound recorder

Equipment: Zoom H4N
                        
Please note: The Clapperboard was used incorrectly so sound log may not detail SCENE/SHOT/TAKE

File type, clip title & comments:

1.     STE-000.wav- In This volume of the audio is at a perfect level. Only footsteps heard and no dialogue was present.


2.     STE-001.wav- First piece of dialogue (SCENE1/SHOT/2/ Take 1)- Usable as it was clear.

3.     STE-002.wav- (Take 2) Clear as the mic was near the talent.

S
4.     STE-003.wav- (Close up) of the cigarette being offered. Good sound of packet being opened.
5.     STE-004.wav- Close up of Kieran 'Left of the bench'. Most of it usable  but messed up his lines in some of the sequence.
6.     STE-005.wav- Take 2 of close up. Not usable as pedestrians talking. Stopped recording.

7.     STE-006.wav- Take 3. All clear. Both actors voices captured.

8.     STE-007.wav –(SCENE 1/SHOT 4/TAKE 1) Richard's dialogue. The sound was up and down due to performance.

9.     STE-008.wav – Take 2. Some dialogue was fine but I moved equipment which interfered with take

10.  N/A.wav – Take 3. Clear audio. Usable.

11. N/A.wav – Take 4. Usable. No forgotten lines. Clear audio.

12. N/A.wav – Two shot. Usable. Captured perfect sound as script was revised by the boom operator.

Behind the Scenes: Stubborn



Photography by Connor Fieldsend

Films that considered sound recording

 Birdman (2014) - Directed by: Alejandro González Iñárritu
Sound recording by: Adam Sanchez

Birdman is a film about an actor (Michael Keaton) that is making his comeback by directing and starring in a Broadway play. The film is shot as a continuous take but is cut in some scenes (invisible editing). The boom operator would be present in the rehearsals of the scenes as the operator would need to know where to place the mic at what time. The operator would be as important as the cameraman. If the boom operator did not know where he should place the mic it would cause a problem in post-production; some dialogue would be quieter than the rest of good capture dialogue.

In Stubborn I would ask the director to go through the scenes about three times to get what movement I would have to make to capture the best sound possible. Sound is important and I need to same level of sound capturing for each character, location, subject etc.

Hunger (2009) - Directed by: Steve McQueen

Hunger has one of longest takes in film history. The conversation between characters Bobby Sands (Michael Fassbender & Father Dominic Moran (Liam Cunningham) lasts 17 minutes. I appreciate the sound operator as he/she had one of the biggest tasks of not getting the boom pole in the shot. We can see that radio mics were not used as Bobby is shirtless and I'm sure Father  Dominic is not wearing one also. Again, the rehearsal of the shoot would have boom operator heavily involved as if the boom is in shot then they would have had to start again.

Lost River (2015) - Directed by: Ryan Gosling
Sound recording by: Gail  Carroll-Cole 

Lost River used sound recording in a very interesting way. I went to a Q&A with Ryan Gosling & Matt Smith back in April, they revealed some interesting way of capturing sound and recording Automated dialogue replacement (ADR). Actor Matt Smith recorded some ADR off his iPhone to give the film a more experimental & more personal feel. I think the ambient sound in Matt Smith's narration created realism for the viewer, even though some audience members would not of noticed it. Having watched Lost River again after the Q&A, I did notice some unconventional techniques for a feature film by a well-known Hollywood actor. Ryan Gosling was inspired by the likes of David Lynch, Derek Cianfrance and Nicolas Winding Refn.

Source: imdb.com

Tuesday 5 May 2015

Stubborn Script - My notes

 Audio equipment needed:
·         Zoom H4N
·         XLR Cable
·         Rode boompole
·         Shock Mount
·         Rode shotgun mic
·         SD Card 16g
·         Batteries AAA x2






Sound recorder script notes

All rights reserved














‘Stubborn’

By

Connor Fieldsend






















Pre-Title Scene (No sound for this but ambient sound for Post)

INT. Multistory car park

The man walks up a flight of stairs.

Post-Titles

EXT. Park bench (location depends on availability)
[Revise script for recording. Only one Zoom H4N will be used and I will need to get the best quality audio I can for post-production. The script will be revised so I will know where to move the shotgun mic at what time This is one location.]

Man no.1 enters the frame from the right after the camera tracks towards the park bench and halts at a wide shot, the man sits down.
Man no.2 enters from the left a few seconds later, sits down on the left of the bench. He lights a cigarette and taps his foot anxiously as he looks toward the house he’s just walked from. Mumbled chitchat is heard in the background.

Man no.1

What’s wrong? Nobody’s looking

Man no.2 turns back to Man no.1 and slowly offers him a cigarette.

Man no.1

You know I can’t smoke, that escaped your memory?

Man no.2 breathes out a puff of smoke, heavily.

Speaking softly

Man no.2

You’re such a stubborn shit.

Ignoring his remarks, Man no.1 carries on.

Man no.1

So what got you smoking again after vowing so much last time not to?

Man no.2 pauses, looks at him in wonder.



Man no.2

You did! And all this funeral bollocks!

Man no.1

Shit reason. Next.

Man no.1 shakes his head.


Man no.1 (CONT’D)

Why would I make you smoke again? Your own brother?

Man no.2 frowns and leans towards him.

Man no.2

Are you serious… Because you’re leaving us all behind. Your family.  

Man no.2 regains his posture.

Man no.2 (CONT’D)

You’re at least coming with us to the funeral before you go.

Man no.1 turns away from him, looks at the house. Quiet.

Pauses. Apologizes bluntly.

Man no.1

Sorry.

Man no.2 turns away from him. Has a puff of his cigarette.

Man no.2

No you’re not.

He turns to man no.1.




Man no.2 (CONT’D)

You have it all now. No troubles, plights, enemies… parents. You don’t even have a life.

Man no.1 lowers his head and grins.

Man no.1

Very funny… Christ, you smell like an ashtray!

Wafts the smoke dramatically.

Man no.2

Yeah? Like I give a shit what you think. You didn’t even wanna be here.

Man no.1 looks amused.

Man no.1

Remember when we were younger and you used to run up to nan and steal her fags then snap them in two, calling ‘em ‘nasty-cigs!’

Man no.2 laughs under his breath. Taps the cigarette ash.

Man no.2

Not as funny as when you were 8… eyeing up Arnie’s arse cheeks on The Terminator, proper leaning towards the telly. Gay boy.

Man no.1 replies swiftly.

Man no.1

Yeah well, that phase never stopped.

They both laugh.

Man no.2

I can remember seeing you playing Terminator when you were in year three and shouting, “bring me Sarah Connor!” I tried to tell people you weren’t my brother ‘cause you were embarrassing me so much.

  Man no.1 smiles.

Man no.1

Christ, those were the days. I always shouted to Mr. Daniels that ‘I’ll be back’ every time I went for a piss.

He remembers something; smiles widely.

Man no.1 (CONT’D)

Remember how Mum used to always love parents evening because Mr. Daniels would be there. She basically cheated on dad with her mind.

Man no.2 shows a small grin.

Man no.2

I can’t remember that as much, we were three years apart in school. Remember?

Man no.1 shrugs.

Man no.1

Ohhh yeah. I guess time’s not a big part of my life anymore… you could say.

Man no.1 looks down. Man no.2 lets out a deep, shaking breath out of sudden frustration and anger. Man no.1 looks up and notices, but doesn’t say anything; he just looks at him.

Man no.2

Can you not just tell me why you’re not coming to the funeral, please?

Man no.1 replies quickly.

Man no.1

I’m scared how they’re gonna react, alright?

He wipes his eyes. Man no.2 shakes his head in more frustration; says nothing. He puffs the last bit of smoke from his cigarette, stubs it out, and quickly produces a new one from his packet. His hands are trembling as he lights it up. He finally replies to man no.1 in a quiet, vicious tone.

Man no.2

You didn’t see mum and dad during the few days after it happened; they were crying, I mean really. Fucking. Distraught, Ben.

The camera focuses on Ben’s (man no.1) pale skin.

Man no.1

Whole truth?

Man no.2 gives a stubborn reply.

Man no.2

Yes. Yes.

Man no.1 stays silent for a brief moment.

Man no.1

Fine, I guess I’ll go. But only if you promise that I’ll see how regretful mum and dad are when they treated me like that. To them, I was like the Antichrist for liking men. They never believed in what choices I made; only in that twat with sandals in the sky.

Man no.2

But they were speechless when they found you. And so was I, you selfish prick.

Man no.1 looks down. Man no.2 softens up and closes his hand over man no.1’s shoulder. Man no.2 lets out a deep breath. Man no.1 nods and says nothing; he’s agreed to go to the funeral. Man no.2 smiles wanly, his head is down.

Man no.2 (CONT’D)

I love you, Ben.

Brief Cutaway (flashback)

Man no.1 steps up onto the ledge of the building.

Return to the main scene

Man no.1 speaks in a silent and soft tone of voice.

Man

I’ll always be there for ya.

After the camera switches to a wide shot opposite the two characters on the table (different to the regular wide shot seen beforehand), another man, wearing all black, approaches the bench/table. He’s silent and walking slowly until he reaches the two people. He speaks in a low voice to man no.2; ignoring man no.1 completely.

Man no.3 (Man no.2’s best friend)

You ready, mate?





Man no.2 finishes and stubs out his cigarette.

Man no.2

Yeah.

Man no.2 gets up from the table and walks away with his friend (man no.3), leaving man no.1 behind at the bench/table. He doesn’t look bothered at all.

Brief cutaway (flashback)

Man no.1 jumps off the ledge.

Return to the main scene

Man no.2 continues to walk away from the table. The camera looks back at the table and shows that there’s nobody sat there, despite man no.1 being there moments ago.

Fade into black; credits role (the end)



Revelation: Throughout the film, the shoes that man no.1 is wearing are the same ones as the man who commits suicide in the flashbacks (wearing the same clothes). The person that man no.2 has been talking to throughout the film was dead, and he knew he was dead because they’re siblings and man no.2 loved him the most even when he came out to his religious parents and they partially and indirectly resulted in his suicide.

Extra Note: the cutaways for the build-up to the suicide don’t have to be implying the jumping off of a ledge, as this was the first idea. There could be other cutaway scenes depicting a different suicide instead, with possibly a bottle of pills or a bloody razor, just to allow for interior shots in the flashbacks (cutaways).
































How to use Zoom H4N


Using on the device
  • Turn monitor off (when possible). Having it on for long period of time could interfere with the recording.
  • When recording in 'mono' press  2 & 3 on the left of the device. Go into menu by using the scroller on the right.

What the numbers on the left mean:

1-internal use (input)
2-Microphone (output)
3-Microphone (output)

Select '1' (input) on the device

  • Make sure Mono mix is off
  • 1/2 mix in the menu is off
    (In that order) 


A Microphone goes into Part 1 for recording sound.

'Phatom' power needs to be on to make the microphone work.

Click 'Rec' to format the sound files.
Always Rec format - WAV48KHZ when working with video
Also select 24bit in the menu 

Note - you may want to reformat the device when you use it to swipe any audio which is not 
apart of your project.

Dialogue should be around '-12' so it doesn't peak. (Make sure you check the levels when recording. This could cause interference)

Information taught in University seminars 2014/2015

Rite (2010)

Directed by: Michael Pearce

A Father spends a day with his son on his son's birthday. As the day processes, tension between the two reveals some truths which will change the course of their relationship.

The Father character is the main protagonist who is seen as a working-class British man who loves football. The son character is a 'alternative' person who is the opposite of his Father. In the film we sees the Dad trying to connect with his son by asking questions about his appearance and whatnot. I found this interesting about the dialogue is very realistic and the audience does see that the Dad is trying to understand and connect with his son. The young man is very quiet with his Dad as they don't have much in common and this shows throughout. The son hints his sexuality to his Dad but the script does this so subtly and it feels very refreshing in the style this is done in. What I felt was surprising was how the Dad kept the news of his son's preferences in sexual relations; his son answers 'Black'. Despite the film not going down the race route, I was surprised that the Dad did not kick off with the answer because of who the Dad character seems to be a typical middle aged person that would care about his son being involved with a person of a different race. This is probably my own ignorance that came up with this suggestion, I will try not to judge a book by its cover.

Some of the scenes in Rite fit well into the typical British Hooligan films that have made a presence known since 2008, The extras in the pub had the biggest impact on me and I enjoyed looking at the realism they gave. Each one of them looked like they along there and made the scene seem believable.

The use and not so use of sound in Rite was impressive. The scenes in the interior of the were brilliantly recorded and again I'm praising the dialogue for it's realism and fluency. There is a particular scene in the short film where the Dad picks a fight with one of the locals in the pub toilet to show the audience his anger about losing the football tickets. The scene did not feature any sound, however without it it felt more violent than it would be with it.

The conclusion of the film is of the Dad accepting his son's sexuality and taking responsibility for the people he cares about and the choices he has made. This is a well crafted realization short film that delivers a strong message.